Fortran Runtime Error Expected Real For Item In Formatted Transfer Got Character
Mein KontoSucheMapsYouTubePlayNewsGmailDriveKalenderGoogle+ÜbersetzerFotosMehrShoppingDocsBooksBloggerKontakteHangoutsNoch mehr von GoogleAnmeldenAusgeblendete FelderNach Gruppen oder Nachrichten suchen Forums Search Forums Recent Posts Unanswered Threads Videos Search Media New Media Members Notable Members Current Visitors Recent Activity New Profile Get test.F90 (attached). 2. % gfortran test.F90 3. % ./a.out Actual results: Program prints the following output: --- Fortran runtime error: Expected INTEGER for item 4 in formatted transfer, got REAL The '(A,I3,7(A,E12.8))' thing is also a neat trick. Maybe having a bigger matrix to print out is a problem? weblink
Browse other questions tagged fortran or ask your own question. Can anyone shed some light on what's happening? edit: a nicer use of the format statement would be '(A,I3,7(A,E12.8))' share|improve this answer edited Mar 21 '11 at 14:58 answered Mar 21 '11 at 14:51 steabert 3,17211525 1 Ok, jedishrfu, Nov 8, 2014 Nov 8, 2014 #9 Matterwave Science Advisor Gold Member jedishrfu said: ↑ You can over specify formatted fields as then they don't get used and there's no
Fortran Runtime Error Expected Real For Item In Formatted Transfer Got Character
Kvashnin agkvashnin at gmail.com Wed Jul 30 08:19:14 CEST 2014 Previous message: [Pw_forum] Error in example03 (electron-phonon interaction) Next message: [Pw_forum] espresso-4.0.3 Compilation Issues Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ See gcc/fortran/options.c: case OPT_std_f2003: gfc_option.allow_std = GFC_STD_F95_OBS | GFC_STD_F77 | GFC_STD_F2003 | GFC_STD_F95 | GFC_STD_F2008_OBS; case OPT_std_f2008: gfc_option.allow_std = GFC_STD_F95_OBS | GFC_STD_F77 | GFC_STD_F2003 | GFC_STD_F95 | GFC_STD_F2008 | GFC_STD_F2008_OBS; case Right now I am working on changing the code around so that it actually writes out the correct output instead of the old output. and prints a digit (1) under the line, positioned so that it points to the place in the line where (or just at the end of where) the error happened.
Man, Fortran is strange... –Emanuel Ey Mar 21 '11 at 15:07 2 The error message is related, when the end of the format specifiers is reached and there are more Yes, my password is: Forgot your password? Not the answer you're looking for? C NCLFORTSTART subroutine writeint(ntim,nmod,xtas) implicit none integer ntim,nmod integer xtas(nmod,ntim) C NCLEND ...works as expected.
By changing 20 to 38, the code runs fine now and prints the correct values. :) Matterwave, Nov 9, 2014 (Want to reply to this thread? The alternative fix, of removing the "implicit none" line, is NOT allowed in this course. Otherwise declare line as real to math the "f" descriptor. Edited my answer –ev-br Dec 14 '11 at 14:18 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using
Thanks! Now we want to allow it with -std=gnu or -std=f2008. Secondly, the point is not that GFC_STD_GNU and GFC_STD_F2008 are same (they obviously aren't), but that having (compile_options.allow_std | GFC_STD_F2008) != 0 => implies (compile_options.allow_std | GFC_STD_GNU) != 0 which is Why can't I do ls -a 1>&-?
Fortran Bad Value During Floating Point Read
more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed It may also help to use numbered FORMAT statements which stand separately from the READ or WRITE statements where the input or output is done. Fortran Runtime Error Expected Real For Item In Formatted Transfer Got Character For example, Code (Text): write(6,'(a1,f15.10,i5,1p,(20e15.7))')'x',r,iter,dr,err, & & xsum(1:nflavor,1:nflavor),xbarsum(1:nflavor,1:nflavor) open(unit=7,file='status') write(7,'(a1,f15.10,i5,1p,(20e15.7))')'x',r,iter,dr,err, & & xsum(1:nflavor,1:nflavor),xbarsum(1:nflavor,1:nflavor) close(7) adding the extra set of parentheses around the 20E15.7 edit descriptor means Read Command Fortran Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8.
Fixed Code real, dimension(10) :: P integer :: i ... have a peek at these guys Quick fix: in ef_shift.f90, define def(3) as complex. > More here: > http://www.qe-forge.org/gf/project/q-e/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=% > 2F&view=rev&sortby=rev&sortdir=down&revision=11040 > > P. > > On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 13:48 +0400, Alexander G. If you increase the number of array items you wish to output by changing the dimension of these arrays without changing the number of fields allocated in the format string, the I found the following error > > message: > > > > > > At line 104 of file ef_shift.f90 (unit = 6, file = 'stdout') > > Fortran runtime error: Format Fortran
URL: http://pwscf.org/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20140730/320bee76/attachment.html Previous message: [Pw_forum] Error in example03 (electron-phonon interaction) Next message: [Pw_forum] espresso-4.0.3 Compilation Issues Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] write(*,*,advance="no") "Enter your nickname: " 1 ... Compiled with the following command gfortran skewt9.f95 -o srun9 The code compiled with no error messages, and produced the output filesrun9 . check over here Today > > I tried to make test calculations using example03 (QE-5.1).
Is 'if there's any' grammatical in this sentence? More ont this here http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/compilerpro/en-us/fortran/lin/compiler_f/lref_for/source_files/pghredf.htm . I wonder though, why it is that the error message was completely unrelated to the problem...
How should I interpret "English is poor" review when I used a language check service before submission?
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Comment 3 Ben Webb 2008-11-30 13:54:19 EST I guess this bug has been fixed upstream, since I can no longer reproduce the jedishrfu, Nov 8, 2014 Nov 8, 2014 #5 Matterwave Science Advisor Gold Member jedishrfu said: ↑ As I look at the formatting I see a1 for the 'x' and f15.10 for This has been discussed in Bug 41711.) 10.7.2.4 B, O, and Z editing 1 [...] The corresponding input/output list item shall be of type integer, real, or complex. ... 4 The If you want to read an integer use i edit descriptor (i3 for example).
You can also get this error if your array index hasn't been declared, or hasn't been initialized or otherwise defined. Edits Needed I forgot that I had wanted to print the array index i first. Comment 9 Jerry DeLisle 2013-01-02 20:02:51 UTC Looking at transfer.c and trying the test case provided here, I believe this is fixed. this content I'm very new to Fortran, and although i understand the code and have now ported several thousand lines, I'm a noob at writing Fortran code myself.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug. SteamKing, Nov 8, 2014 Nov 9, 2014 #13 Matterwave Science Advisor Gold Member SteamKing said: ↑ I think you have to be careful and make sure the number of items in Is accuracy binary? I am getting this runtime error: Code (Text): At line 2057 of file bulb-new.F90 (unit = 6, file = 'stdout') Fortran runtime error: Expected INTEGER for item 26 in formatted transfer,
So fix the stuff you know to be wrong, and then recompile and see of the other error messages also disappear. Kvashnin > > > > ===================================================== > > PhD Student > > Moscow Institute of Physics and > > Technology http://mipt.ru/ > > 141700, Institutsky lane 9, > > Dolgoprudny, Moscow It needs to be cleaned up. Regards, Frank fortran share|improve this question edited Dec 12 '11 at 19:55 Chris Cashwell 13.3k103777 asked Dec 12 '11 at 15:54 user1094052 813 1 Whilst this doesn't answer the question,
This is useful information. Last edited: Nov 8, 2014 Matterwave, Nov 8, 2014 Nov 8, 2014 #4 jedishrfu Staff: Mentor As I look at the formatting I see a1 for the 'x' and f15.10 for Since your format string contains descriptors for printing single variables, the method normally used to force the formatting of an implied DO loop to start at a particular location in the Implicit type declarations, which is what you have used, can cause lots of nasty, hard to find bugs. –Chris Dec 12 '11 at 16:33 This actually does answer the
This code: write(6,'(A,I3,A,E12.8,A,E12.8,A,E12.8,A,E12.8,A,E12.8)') 'iHyd:', & ih,'; dzdr: ',dzdr,'; tauray:', tauRay,'; zRay: ', & zray,'; ampRay: ',realpart(aray),'+j*', & imagpart(aray),'; qRay: ',qray,'; width :',w Compiles fine, but when run, the program exits with: The FORMAT statement is one of the trickier statements to master in learning Fortran, but it can provide a flexible means of printing formatted data when it is learned. Based on your comments about this problem, it is not clear if you are intending to print out all the values in the XSUM and XBARSUM arrays or just certain values. Why does this test yield True Is there any job that can't be automated?
I think you have to be careful and make sure the number of items in the output list of the WRITE statement matches the edit descriptors in the corresponding format string. Matterwave, Nov 8, 2014 Phys.org - latest science and technology news stories on Phys.org •Game over? What does a well diversified self-managed investment portfolio look like? In the United States is racial, ethnic, or national preference an acceptable hiring practice for departments or companies in some situations?
So instead I need to give it a format. Can a Legendary monster ignore a diviner's Portent and choose to pass the save anyway? The program should output: 1111011 111111100111010111000010100100 1111011 111111100111010111000010100100 173 7747270244 173 7747270244 7B 3F9D70A4 7B 3F9D70A4 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001111011 0000000000000000000000000000000000111111100111010111000010100100 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001111011 0000000000000000000000000000000000111111100111010111000010100100 000000000000000000000173 000000000000007747270244 000000000000000000000173 000000000000007747270244 000000000000007B 000000003F9D70A4 000000000000007B 000000003F9D70A4 Comment 1 Tobias