Home > Fortran Error > Fortran Error 6404

Fortran Error 6404

You have to tell it what they are with: real*8, external :: dev, norm However, this is not enough, as both function dev and norm require an explicit interface, because dev asked 3 months ago viewed 68 times active 3 months ago Linked 2 Error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type Related 5compiling a Skip to main content Developer Zone Join today Log in DevelopmentOSAndroid*Chrome*HTML5Windows*Device2-in-1 & Ultrabook™Business ClientEmbedded SystemsIoTServer, Workstation, HPCTechnologyBig DataDual ScreenGame DevIntel® RealSense™ISA ExtensionsMachine LearningModern CodeNetworkingOpen SourceStorageToolsDeveloper TypeEmbedded SystemsGame DevMediaTechnical, Enterprise, HPCWebOSAll ToolsAndroid*HTML5Linux*OS Can a Legendary monster ignore a diviner's Portent and choose to pass the save anyway? weblink

more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Science Save your draft before refreshing this page.Submit any pending changes before refreshing this page. The errors: Error 1 error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type. [DEV] D:\Users\Vahid\Documents\Visual Studio 2008\Projects\Tst\Tst\Source1.for 66 Error 2 error #6404: This name does Broke brake bleeder valve Review paper/book on Finite Difference Methods for PDEs How do I say "Thank you, Captain Obvious?" Removing elements from an array that are in another array Export

Now I did. A Shadowy Encounter With the passing of Thai King Bhumibol, are there any customs/etiquette as a traveler I should be aware of? A: It’s actually simple. But I also had to change the name norm to something else.

Oct 4, 2011 #1 Simfish Gold Member /home/disk/p/atms380/xx/October-Runs/timeManMod/SourceMods/time_manager.F90(664): error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type. [FLOOR] tmd = day_earth/PLANET_DAY_RATIO - floor(day_earth/PLANET_DAY_RATIO) I'm running error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type - using function in subroutine up vote As far as I can tell, floor is a function introduced in Fortran 90 Using Fortran compiler: ifort -O -I/home/disk/eos11/bitz/cam3.1/cam1/models/utils/esmf -I/home/disk/eos11/bitz/cam3.1/cam1/models/utils/esmf/src/include -I/home/disk/eos11/bitz/cam3.1/cam1/models/utils/esmf/build/linux_intel -I/home/disk/eos11/bitz/cam3.1/cam1/models/utils/esmf/include -I/home/disk/eos11/bitz/cam3.1/cam1/models/utils/esmf/src/Infrastructure/mpiuni Fortran Compiler version: Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64

Just changed it to correct data type representation. Thanks so much.UpdateCancelAnswer Wiki1 Answer Bruce Alan Martin, I began writing "software" before Tukey coined the word. (I call it "tripodics")Written 39w agoApparently, there is at least one variable in your It compiles and runs but mrqmin fails to give results.mikrom:This is the exact text in the "Numerical Recipies" book:SUBROUTINE mrqmin(x,y,sig,ndata,a,ia,ma,covar,alpha,nca,* chisq,funcs,alamda)INTEGER ma,nca,ndata,ia(ma),MMAXREAL alamda,chisq,funcs,a(ma),alpha(nca,nca),covar(nca,nca),* sig(ndata),x(ndata),y(ndata)PARAMETER (MMAX=20) Set to largest number of t mod() definitely works, so I'm pretty sure that floor() should work too Simfish, Oct 5, 2011 Oct 5, 2011 #6 uart Science Advisor Hi simfish.

Prendergast # January 2009, Molecular Foundry # Precompiler options # COMPFLAG = -DINTEL PARAFLAG = -DMPI MATHFLAG = -DUSESCALAPACK DEBUGFLAG = -DDEBUG -DVERBOSE FCPP = /lib/cpp -ansi F90free = /usr/local/openmpi-intel111/bin/mpif90 -free Here's an edit of your code which has at least a chance of compiling: program iiuu implicit none REAL*8 d d=POTENCIAL(1.0d0,1.0d0,1.0d0,1.0d0,1.4d0,1.4d0) write(*,*) 'potential=', d contains real*8 FUNCTION POTENCIAL(R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6) REAL*8 R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6,V2,V3,V4 real*8, Any ideas where I'm wrong? A: First of all, it’s good practice to include source code when asking questions about errors like this.

You must call this routine repeatedly until convergence is achieved. Can a Legendary monster ignore a diviner's Portent and choose to pass the save anyway? Thanks for the tips. –user3410012 Mar 12 '14 at 20:52 2 Or just use the function norm2 from Fortran 2008. –Vladimir F Mar 13 '14 at 8:38 add a comment| What happens when 2 Blade Barriers intersect?

You won't confuse the compiler, you may confuse yourself. have a peek at these guys Close this window and log in. my_file.f(11): error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type. [POTENCIAL] d=POTENCIAL(1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.4,1.4) This is with the ifort compiler, and I hope it is not a What sense of "hack" is involved in five hacks for using coffee filters?

fortran intel-fortran share|improve this question edited Jan 30 '15 at 12:23 Ffisegydd 16.1k43563 asked Dec 11 '11 at 8:08 user1092021 41113 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up Either package your functions into modules and use them, or use contains statement, like in the example above 1.0 is single-precision. FFTW_MEASURE+FFTW_IN_PLACE+FFTW_USE_WISDOM) ----------------------------------^ ../Common/fftw.f90(284): error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type. [FFTW_FORWARD] call fftwnd_f77_create_plan(minus_plan,3,Nfft,FFTW_FORWARD, & ----------------------------------------------------^ ../Common/fftw.f90(285): warning #6075: The data type of the check over here However, I have listed all my variables.

Maybe xwb could say if it's bug or not...I found the Fortran 90 version of mrqmin too:http://www.phys.uu.nl/DU/num_recipes/fortran.208/f90/recipes/mrqmin.f90and here funcs is declared as an subroutineCODEINTERFACESUBROUTINE funcs(x,a,yfit,dyda)USE nrtypeREAL(SP), DIMENSION(:), INTENT(IN) :: x,aREAL(SP), DIMENSION(:), That's considered appropriate. –xpda Dec 12 '11 at 6:09 add a comment| up vote 2 down vote I got it to work. The error should have been:e6.f(57): error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type.[FUNCS]&funcs, alamda)------^compilation aborted for e6.f (code 1)In other words: fgauss is funcs.

Q: Does anyone know how to overload intrinsic functions?

FFTW_MEASURE+FFTW_IN_PLACE+FFTW_USE_WISDOM) ----------------------------------^ ../Common/fftw.f90(284): error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type. [FFTW_FORWARD] call fftwnd_f77_create_plan(minus_plan,3,Nfft,FFTW_FORWARD, & ----------------------------------------------------^ ../Common/fftw.f90(285): warning #6075: The data type of the Q: Hi! However then I would expect the following code to produce the same error: program test INTEGER ::a=5, b call sub(a,b) write(*,*) b end program SUBROUTINE sub(a,b) INTEGER, INTENT(in) ::a INTEGER, INTENT(out) Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.Tek-Tips Posting Policies Jobs Jobs from Indeed What: Where: jobs by Link To This Forum!

Risk Management in Single engined piston aircraft flight Open hemisphere is connected more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info In this case, however, I think there is enough code printed in the above compiler output to tell that the source is in Fixed form layout, which you can see from Preeferably using f95 comnpliant syntax if possible. http://epssecurenet.com/fortran-error/fortran-error-2290.html But they are not recognized as functions.

It looks like your compiler is reading the statements in those commented lines, so it is probably treating the file as if it were in Free form layout. Close Reply To This Thread Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature. day of month tod ! It seems strange to use parameters in functions where you don't actually use any of the entities defined in the module.

Not really. Use 1.d0 to tell the compiler it's a double precision number Why on earth do you send six numbers instead of having an array as an argument of the potencial function? year mon, &! I would vote up now but I got no enough reputation. –user3410012 Mar 12 '14 at 20:55 Sigh - link has rotted. –Michael Anderson May 6 at 5:34 add